Peter Diamandis

Rank 13 of 47
|
Score 133

The statement engages with a public issue concerning the capabilities and limitations of large language models (LLMs) like GPT-4, which is a topic of significant public interest and debate. It questions the trustworthiness of AI in handling reasoning tasks, which is a substantive issue in the field of AI ethics and technology.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not use harmful language and presents information in a neutral manner, adhering to the principle of doing no harm. [+1]
  2. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement encourages readers to think critically about AI capabilities, promoting understanding and potentially empathy towards the limitations of AI. [+1]
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement invites dialogue by posing a question about trust in AI, which can lead to constructive criticism and discussion. [+1]
  4. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement uses its platform to responsibly discuss AI capabilities, aligning with the principles of free speech and integrity. [+1]