Reposted by Dr. Jill Stein🌻
Kentuckian Mélenchoniste 🌹🇫🇷
@ExMiserian597
·
398d
The statement engages in public discourse by discussing electoral politics and criticizing a political party. It asserts that Jill Stein is on enough ballots to win the presidency and accuses Democrats of lying and defending genocide.
- The statement uses strong language and accusations, which could be seen as harmful or inflammatory, potentially violating the principle of doing no harm. [-2]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The accusation of defending genocide is a serious claim that could be considered disrespectful and damaging to the dignity of others, violating the principle of respecting privacy and dignity. [-2]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue, instead making a broad accusation against a political group, which could be seen as a personal attack. [-2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.