The statement is critical of Amendment 4, suggesting it was crafted with deceptive intent by left-wing groups with external funding. It implies negative consequences if the amendment is passed.
Principle 1:
I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.The statement uses strong language that could be seen as inflammatory, potentially causing harm by misrepresenting the intentions of those who support the amendment.
[-1]Principle 2:
I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.It accuses groups of deception without providing evidence, which could be seen as disrespectful and potentially defamatory.
[-1]Principle 4:
I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.The statement does not engage in constructive dialogue or provide a balanced view, focusing instead on attacking the amendment's proponents.
[-1]Principle 6:
I will use my influence for the betterment of society.The statement uses its platform to influence public opinion against the amendment, but it does so in a way that may not promote informed decision-making.
[-1]