The statement is critical of Amendment 4, suggesting it was crafted with deceptive intent by left-wing groups with external funding. It implies negative consequences if the amendment is passed.
- The statement uses strong language that could be seen as inflammatory, potentially causing harm by misrepresenting the intentions of those who support the amendment. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- It accuses groups of deception without providing evidence, which could be seen as disrespectful and potentially defamatory. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not engage in constructive dialogue or provide a balanced view, focusing instead on attacking the amendment's proponents. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses its platform to influence public opinion against the amendment, but it does so in a way that may not promote informed decision-making. [-1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.