The statement is a critique of corporate media, accusing it of being a propaganda tool and failing to cover significant issues like genocide. It also includes a political promise to take action against corporate media through antitrust measures, which constitutes public discourse as it addresses media influence and policy actions.
- The statement does not directly harm with words, but the accusatory tone could contribute to a divisive atmosphere.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech, but it does make a broad accusation against corporate media.Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion; it is more accusatory and confrontational.Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue; it makes a sweeping accusation without engaging with opposing views.Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses influence to propose a policy change, which could be seen as an attempt to better society by addressing media monopolies.Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement exercises free speech and uses the platform to propose a policy change, but the accusatory tone may not reflect responsible use of the platform.Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.