Jill Stien

Rank 44 of 47
|
Score -126

The statement involves a critique of the Democratic National Committee (DNC) allegedly influencing a journalist's interview questions, which touches on issues of media independence and political influence, thus constituting public discourse.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not directly harm others but raises concerns about potential harm to journalistic integrity.
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech, but it questions the actions of a political organization.
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement does not explicitly promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, as it is more accusatory in nature. [-1]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement raises a critical issue but does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. [+1]
  5. Principle 6:
    I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
    The statement uses influence to question political practices, which could be seen as aiming for societal betterment by advocating for transparency. [+1]
  6. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement upholds free speech by questioning political influence on media, using the platform to raise awareness. [+1]