The statement encourages critical thinking and questioning, which can be seen as engaging with public discourse. However, without additional context or content from the linked website, it's challenging to fully assess its adherence to the principles. The statement's tone is inquisitive and potentially provocative, aiming to stimulate thought or discussion.
- The statement does not directly cause harm, but without context, it's unclear if it avoids harm entirely.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The call to 'follow the truth' and 'think for ourselves' can promote understanding and critical thinking, but lacks explicit empathy or compassion.Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments, maintaining a neutral stance. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- Encourages free thought, aligning with free speech principles, but the responsibility and integrity of the platform use depend on the linked content. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.