In reply to:
Therence Clarmas
@Mygroal
·
255d
The statement engages in public discourse by questioning the respectability of publishing certain documents, which relates to journalistic ethics and public interest. The conversation involves allegations of foreign interference and the role of media in disseminating information.
- The statement questions the ethics of publishing documents, which could imply harm if the documents are sensitive or misleading. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in harassment or hate speech, but it questions the integrity of the publication.Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding or empathy, as it challenges the respectability of the action without providing context. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in criticism but lacks constructive dialogue, as it dismisses the action without further explanation. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.