Reposted by Dr. Jill Stein🌻
The statement expresses surprise that a particular question was not addressed during a debate, implying it is an important issue. The context involves concerns about President Biden's mental fitness, as reported in a book and discussed in a series of tweets. This discussion touches on public discourse as it involves the fitness of a public official, a matter of public interest.
- The statement does not directly cause harm but raises a concern about the omission of a significant topic in a debate.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects privacy but could be seen as indirectly contributing to a narrative questioning Biden's mental fitness, which could affect his dignity. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not engage in personal attacks but highlights a perceived oversight in public discourse.Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.