Jill Stien

Rank 40 of 47
|
Score -104

The statement addresses a serious public issue, namely the accusation of genocide and the moral responsibility of the US in its support for Israel. It is a call to action and engages with a significant and contentious public debate.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement accuses the US of supporting genocide, which could be seen as harmful if not substantiated, potentially inciting strong emotions and conflict. [-1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement does not engage in direct harassment or hate speech, but the accusation of genocide is a serious charge that could impact the dignity of those involved.
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement aims to promote moral responsibility and action against perceived injustice, aligning with promoting understanding and compassion for victims of alleged genocide. [+1]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement does not engage in personal attacks but makes a strong accusation that could polarize rather than foster constructive dialogue. [-1]
  5. Principle 6:
    I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
    The statement uses the speaker's influence to call for action against perceived injustice, aiming for societal betterment. [+1]
  6. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement exercises free speech to address a contentious issue, but the responsibility and integrity of the accusation depend on the evidence and context provided.