Reposted by Dr. Jill Stein🌻
The statement addresses the issue of corporate influence on regulatory agencies, specifically criticizing the practice of the 'revolving door' between corporations like Monsanto and government agencies. It calls for protection of public interests over corporate profits, which is a substantive engagement with a public issue.
- The statement does not use harmful language and focuses on a systemic issue rather than attacking individuals, aligning with the principle of doing no harm. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement promotes understanding of a public issue by highlighting the potential conflict of interest in regulatory practices, aligning with the principle of promoting understanding. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism of a systemic issue without resorting to personal attacks, aligning with the principle of constructive dialogue. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- By addressing a significant public concern, the statement uses influence to advocate for societal betterment, aligning with the principle of using influence positively. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement responsibly uses free speech to address a public issue, aligning with the principle of using one's platform with integrity. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.