Reposted by Dr. Jill Stein🌻
The statement and image engage in public discourse by addressing climate change and political choices. The tone is confrontational, aiming to criticize a public figure's stance on environmental issues.
- The statement uses a shaming tactic, which can be seen as harmful and not conducive to constructive dialogue. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not respect the dignity of the individual it addresses, potentially engaging in a form of public shaming. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote constructive criticism or dialogue, as it focuses on personal attack rather than engaging with the argument. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.