Jill Stien

Rank 40 of 47
|
Score -104

The statement and the conversation it refers to engage with serious public issues, specifically the depiction of violence and the response of political figures to such events. The tone is critical and emotionally charged, aiming to highlight perceived inadequacies in the response of a political administration to atrocities. The statement is intended to provoke a reaction and possibly a call to action regarding the administration's policies or priorities.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement uses graphic and emotionally charged language, which could be seen as harmful or distressing to some audiences, potentially violating the principle of doing no harm. [-1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement does not engage in direct harassment or hate speech, but the graphic nature of the content could be seen as disrespectful to the dignity of those involved. [-1]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion; rather, it focuses on criticism and highlighting perceived failures. [-1]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement criticizes a political figure's response but does not engage in constructive dialogue or offer solutions, focusing instead on highlighting perceived inadequacies. [-1]
  5. Principle 6:
    I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
    The statement uses its platform to draw attention to serious issues, which could be seen as an attempt to influence public opinion and policy. [+1]
  6. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement exercises free speech but does so in a way that may not fully align with responsible use, given the graphic nature of the content.