Reposted by Dr. Jill Stein🌻
The statement critiques the Democratic Party's approach to climate change, suggesting that both major U.S. political parties are insufficiently addressing the climate crisis. It calls for a replacement of the Democratic Party with a financially independent people's party to effectively combat climate change. This is a substantive engagement with public issues, specifically climate policy and political strategy.
- The statement does not directly harm others but could be seen as divisive by suggesting the replacement of a major political party.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement aims to promote understanding of the urgency of climate action, though it may lack empathy towards those who support the Democratic Party.Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in criticism of the Democratic Party but does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses influence to advocate for a significant change in political strategy to address climate change, aiming for societal betterment. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement exercises free speech responsibly by addressing a critical public issue, though it could be more balanced in its critique. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.