In reply to:
Mark Herman
@Kerplunk905
·
256d
Matt Taibbi
@mtaibbi
·
256d
The statement critiques the financial viability of the league and the players' actions, suggesting a disconnect between marketing efforts and profitability. It engages in public discourse by addressing economic aspects of sports leagues and labor relations.
- The statement could be seen as critical but does not directly harm individuals.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- It does not engage in harassment or hate speech, though it is critical of the players.Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement lacks constructive dialogue and could be seen as dismissive of the players' concerns. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.