The statement appears to engage in public discourse as it addresses a public issue related to military authority and political figures, potentially contributing to civic dialogue. The tone is accusatory and suggests a critique of political actions by the Biden-Harris administration.
Principle 1:
I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.The statement uses charged language that could be seen as harmful or inflammatory, potentially inciting fear or misunderstanding about military authority.
 [-1]Principle 2:
I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.The statement accuses public figures of lying and expands on this with a serious allegation, which could be seen as disrespectful if not substantiated.
 [-1]Principle 3:
I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, as it focuses on accusations and potentially fear-inducing claims.
 [-1]Principle 4:
I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue, as it makes a strong accusation without evidence or an invitation for discussion.
 [-1]Principle 7:
I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.The statement uses free speech to make a serious accusation, but it is unclear if it is done responsibly or with integrity, as it lacks context or evidence.
 [-1]