Reposted by Dr. Jill Stein🌻
The statement critiques a political figure's response regarding transgender rights and healthcare, suggesting skepticism about the administration's commitment to protecting transgender individuals. It references a specific policy decision, indicating engagement with public issues.
- The statement does not directly harm with words but implies criticism of a political figure's stance, which is a part of public discourse.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech, but it does critique a public figure's policy stance.Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, as it focuses on criticism rather than constructive dialogue. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in criticism of a political stance but does not resort to personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses influence to highlight concerns about transgender rights, aiming to inform or warn the public. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds free speech by expressing a critical opinion on a public issue. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.