The statement addresses concerns about disinformation and the role of intelligence agencies, which are significant public issues related to democracy and governance. The tone is critical and suggests a distrust of both foreign and domestic entities in influencing public perception.
- The statement does not directly harm with words but implies a threat to democracy, which could incite fear or distrust.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech, but it does question the integrity of intelligence agencies.Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion; it is more accusatory and critical. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue; it presents a one-sided view without inviting discussion. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses influence to highlight perceived threats to democracy, which could be seen as an attempt to better society by raising awareness. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement exercises free speech by critiquing intelligence agencies, but it should ensure that such critiques are responsible and based on verified information. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.