The statement criticizes the FDA's regulatory actions, suggesting they are detrimental to public health by suppressing various treatments and health practices. It implies a call to action for change in public health policy, thus engaging in public discourse.
- The statement uses strong language ('war on public health') which could be seen as harmful or inflammatory, potentially inciting distrust in a public health institution. [-2]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying or hate speech, but it does not respect the dignity of the FDA as an institution by using aggressive language. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding or empathy, as it presents a one-sided view without acknowledging the FDA's role in ensuring safety. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue, as it uses a confrontational tone without offering evidence or engaging with opposing views. [-2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses its platform to influence public opinion against the FDA, but it does not clearly demonstrate how this benefits society. [-1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement exercises free speech but does so in a manner that may not be responsible or uphold integrity, as it lacks nuance and evidence. [-1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.