Robert Kennedy Jr

Rank 26 of 47
|
Score 31

The statement criticizes the FDA's regulatory actions, suggesting they are detrimental to public health by suppressing various treatments and health practices. It implies a call to action for change in public health policy, thus engaging in public discourse.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement uses strong language ('war on public health') which could be seen as harmful or inflammatory, potentially inciting distrust in a public health institution. [-2]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement does not engage in cyberbullying or hate speech, but it does not respect the dignity of the FDA as an institution by using aggressive language. [-1]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement does not promote understanding or empathy, as it presents a one-sided view without acknowledging the FDA's role in ensuring safety. [-1]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue, as it uses a confrontational tone without offering evidence or engaging with opposing views. [-2]
  5. Principle 6:
    I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
    The statement uses its platform to influence public opinion against the FDA, but it does not clearly demonstrate how this benefits society. [-1]
  6. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement exercises free speech but does so in a manner that may not be responsible or uphold integrity, as it lacks nuance and evidence. [-1]