The statement engages with public issues by discussing the role of intelligence agencies in American democracy, suggesting they pose a threat by propagandizing and censoring citizens. This constitutes public discourse as it addresses concerns about governmental power and freedom of speech.
- The statement does not directly harm with words, but it could incite distrust in public institutions without evidence, which may indirectly cause harm. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech, but it does make a broad accusation against intelligence agencies without specific evidence.Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, as it presents a divisive viewpoint without fostering dialogue. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue, as it makes a sweeping claim without inviting discussion or providing evidence. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses influence to raise awareness of a perceived issue, but it does so in a way that could undermine trust in public institutions without substantiation. [-1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement exercises free speech but may not use the platform responsibly by making unsubstantiated claims. [-1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.