Reposted by Dr. Jill Stein🌻
The statement addresses a public event involving a candidate at an NAACP forum, suggesting a potential issue of censorship or unfair treatment, which constitutes public discourse. The tone is critical and implies a concern for transparency and fairness in public forums.
- The statement does not directly harm others with words or actions, but it implies criticism of the event organizers.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects privacy and dignity, as it does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement aims to promote understanding by highlighting a perceived injustice, but it could be more explicit in fostering empathy and compassion.Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments, but it lacks constructive dialogue or criticism.Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses influence to highlight a potential issue of public concern, aiming for societal betterment. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds free speech by advocating for a candidate's right to speak, but linking to 'x.com' without context may not fully demonstrate responsible platform use.Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.