Reposted by Dr. Jill Stein🌻
The statement engages in public discourse by addressing political dynamics and voter behavior, specifically concerning Jill Stein and Kamala Harris. It suggests a critique of Democratic strategies and implies a broader discussion about voter choice and political competition.
- The statement does not directly harm with words or actions, but it implies a negative view of Democrats' motives without evidence, which could be seen as indirectly harmful. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech, but it does make an assumption about Democrats' intentions without respecting their perspective. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, as it presents a one-sided view without fostering dialogue. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue, as it makes an assumption about Democrats' motives without evidence, which could be seen as a form of personal attack. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses free speech to express a political opinion, but it could be more responsible by providing evidence or fostering a more balanced discussion.Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.