Reposted by Dr. Jill Stein🌻
Quds News Network
@QudsNen
·
450d
The statement is emotionally charged and describes a grave situation involving violence and loss of life, attributing responsibility to certain actors and criticizing their actions. It engages with a public issue, namely the conflict in Gaza, and the use of taxpayer money in military actions.
- The statement uses strong, emotive language that could be seen as harmful or inflammatory, potentially inciting anger or hatred, thus violating the principle of doing no harm. [-2]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not respect the dignity of those it accuses, using terms like 'heartless opportunists,' which could be seen as a form of verbal attack, violating the principle of respecting dignity. [-2]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, as it focuses on blame and condemnation rather than fostering dialogue or understanding. [-2]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue, instead opting for personal attacks and emotionally charged language, violating this principle. [-2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement attempts to use its influence to raise awareness about a serious issue, which aligns with using influence for societal betterment, but the approach may not be constructive. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement exercises free speech but does so in a manner that may not be responsible or uphold integrity, given its inflammatory tone. [-1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.