Reposted by Dr. Jill Stein🌻
The statement is a critique of the Democratic Party, suggesting that their alignment with corporate interests is the reason for electoral outcomes, rather than the influence of third-party candidates like Jill Stein. It engages in public discourse by addressing political accountability and party dynamics.
- The statement does not directly harm with words, but it does place blame on a political group, which could be seen as divisive. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech, but it does criticize a political party.Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, as it focuses on blame rather than constructive dialogue. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in personal attacks but criticizes a political party's actions and priorities, which is a form of constructive criticism. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses influence to highlight perceived issues within a political party, aiming for societal betterment by calling for accountability. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds free speech and uses the platform to express a political opinion, though it could be more balanced. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.