The statement critiques both Trump and Harris, suggesting they are equally problematic and advocates for an alternative by supporting Jill Stein. It uses images to highlight specific policies related to gender-affirming care, aiming to challenge common perceptions and encourage consideration of third-party candidates.
- The statement uses strong language ('horrible') which could be seen as harmful, but it does not engage in hate speech. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- It attempts to promote understanding by presenting an alternative viewpoint and encouraging consideration of third-party candidates. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in criticism of public figures but does not resort to personal attacks. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.