Reposted by Dr. Jill Stein🌻
The statement criticizes Kamala Harris's stance on transgender rights, suggesting that her actions betray the LGBTQIA+ community. It engages with public discourse by addressing a political figure's position on a significant societal issue.
- The statement does not directly harm with words but implies betrayal, which could be seen as emotionally charged. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech, but it does question the integrity of a public figure.Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion; it focuses on expressing a sense of betrayal. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue; it makes a strong accusation without offering a path for discussion. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses influence to highlight a perceived issue within the LGBTQIA+ community, but it does so in a divisive manner. [-1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement exercises free speech but could be more responsible by fostering dialogue rather than division. [-1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.