Reposted by Dr. Jill Stein🌻
The statement expresses strong criticism of Kamala Harris's stance on trans rights, accusing her of prioritizing states' rights over the protection of the trans community. It uses emotionally charged language to convey frustration and urgency regarding the perceived neglect of queer lives.
- The statement uses strong language that could be seen as harmful or inflammatory, potentially inciting anger or violence, which violates the principle of doing no harm. [-2]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in direct harassment or hate speech, but the aggressive tone could contribute to a hostile environment. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, as it focuses on expressing anger and frustration rather than fostering dialogue. [-2]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue, as it uses a confrontational tone and does not offer a path for discussion or resolution. [-2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.