Reposted by Dr. Jill Stein🌻
The statement and linked conversation involve a political campaign and an event with the NAACP, suggesting engagement with public issues and civic dialogue. The tone is critical, implying a perceived injustice or mishandling of the event by the NAACP.
- The statement does not directly harm others but implies criticism of the NAACP's actions.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech, but it does publicly criticize an organization.Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, as it focuses on a perceived slight. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue, as it presents a one-sided view without inviting discussion. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses influence to highlight a perceived issue, but it is unclear if it is for societal betterment.Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement exercises free speech but may not use the platform responsibly by presenting a potentially biased account without context. [-1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.