The statement appears to be a response to criticism from supporters of a public figure, likely in the context of political commentary. It suggests a defense of the speaker's role as a journalist or commentator, distinguishing their work from that of another media outlet. The tone is defensive and clarifies the speaker's professional stance.
- The statement does not appear to cause harm with words or actions, as it is a defense of professional integrity. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others, as it does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement engages in constructive dialogue by clarifying the speaker's role and does not resort to personal attacks. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.