Jill Stien

The statement is a politically charged message that addresses significant public issues, including political leadership, genocide, and the influence of corporate and military interests on politics. It calls for a new political force and encourages voting for change, which constitutes public discourse.

1. Principle 1:

   I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.

   The statement uses strong language that could be seen as harmful or inflammatory, particularly the use of 'genocide' and 'mass murder of children,' which may not be constructive or accurate. This could be seen as a violation of striving to do no harm. [-2]
2. Principle 2:

   I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.

   The statement does not engage in direct harassment or hate speech, but the strong language could be interpreted as disrespectful to those who support the mentioned political figures. [-1]
3. Principle 3:

   I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.

   The statement aims to promote understanding and change by advocating for a new political force, which aligns with promoting empathy and compassion, but the language used may undermine this goal.
4. Principle 4:

   I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.

   The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue, as it uses strong accusatory language without engaging in a reasoned argument or discussion. [-2]
5. Principle 6:

   I will use my influence for the betterment of society.

   The statement attempts to use influence for societal betterment by advocating for a political change that prioritizes people, planet, and peace. [+1]
6. Principle 7:

   I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.

   The statement exercises free speech and uses the platform to call for political change, but the responsibility and integrity of the language used could be questioned.