Reposted by Dr. Jill Stein🌻
Jamie Kranich 🌵🏜️
@jamie_kranich
·
441d
The statement involves public discourse as it addresses the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, a significant and contentious public issue. Dr. Jill Stein's comments on the situation in Palestine, framing it as 'genocide' and 'apartheid,' are strong political statements that contribute to civic dialogue.
- The statement aims to highlight and address human rights issues, aligning with the principle of striving to do no harm. However, the use of charged terms like 'genocide' and 'apartheid' can be polarizing and may not promote constructive dialogue.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement attempts to promote understanding and empathy for Palestinians by highlighting their plight. However, the language used may not foster empathy across all perspectives involved in the conflict.Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in public discourse by addressing a controversial issue. It does not engage in personal attacks but uses strong language that could hinder constructive dialogue. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.