Reposted by Matt Taibbi
The statement criticizes Media Matters and questions the reliability of their research, suggesting they spread misinformation. It also implies skepticism towards The New York Times for using Media Matters as a source.
- The statement could be seen as potentially harmful by accusing Media Matters of spreading misinformation without providing evidence, which may not align with striving to do no harm. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not respect the dignity of Media Matters by labeling them as purveyors of misinformation, which could be seen as a form of public disparagement. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not engage in constructive dialogue and instead makes a personal attack on Media Matters' credibility. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.