Reposted by Bret Baier
The statement discusses a Supreme Court decision allowing Virginia to enforce a law removing non-citizens from voter rolls. It presents the decision as positive and notes disagreement from certain justices, indicating a partisan perspective.
- The statement does not directly harm but could contribute to divisive discourse by framing the decision in a partisan manner. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects privacy by not naming individuals but could be seen as dismissive of opposing views.Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement lacks empathy towards those who may be affected by the decision, focusing instead on the political aspect. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive dialogue, instead highlighting disagreement in a potentially polarizing way. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.