Reposted by Dr. Jill Stein🌻
The statement engages in public discourse by addressing a public issue related to political narratives and media representation, specifically defending Dr. Jill Stein against accusations made by a media figure. The tone is defensive and critical of the Democratic Party and media portrayal.
- The statement does not directly harm with words but uses strong language like 'lie' and 'propaganda,' which could be seen as aggressive. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects the privacy and dignity of Dr. Jill Stein by defending her character, but it indirectly accuses the Democratic Party and media of dishonesty, which could be seen as disrespectful. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, as it focuses on defending an individual and criticizing others without fostering dialogue. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue; it uses strong language and labels the opposing view as 'propaganda,' which could be seen as a personal attack on the media and Democratic Party. [-2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement upholds free speech by expressing an opinion and defending an individual, but it could be more responsible by avoiding inflammatory language.Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.