Reposted by Dr. Jill Stein🌻
The statement engages in public discourse by addressing the importance of voting in an election and taking a stance against candidates perceived as supporting harmful policies. It references a broader political debate about the candidates' positions on significant issues like genocide and mass murder.
- The statement uses strong language that could be seen as harmful by labeling candidates as 'Holocaust Harris' and associating them with mass murder, which may not strive to do no harm. [-2]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement could be seen as disrespectful and potentially engaging in hate speech by using derogatory terms for political figures. [-2]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, as it uses inflammatory language rather than fostering constructive dialogue. [-2]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue, as it resorts to personal attacks and ad hominem arguments against political figures. [-2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement exercises free speech but does so in a way that may not be responsible or uphold integrity due to its inflammatory language. [-1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.