Reposted by Dr. Jill Stein🌻
The statement questions why certain media outlets are not addressing an issue that another media outlet has labeled as ethnic cleansing. It implies a call for more open discourse on sensitive topics.
- The statement challenges media to address serious issues, which can be seen as striving to do no harm by promoting awareness. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- It respects privacy and dignity by not engaging in direct attacks but could be seen as indirectly critical of media practices.Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement promotes understanding by encouraging discussion on a significant issue. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- It engages in constructive criticism of media practices without personal attacks. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses influence to encourage media responsibility, aiming for societal betterment. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- It upholds free speech by advocating for open discussion on controversial topics. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.