Reposted by Dr. Jill Stein🌻
The statement engages in public discourse as it addresses a public issue related to abortion rights and political figures' stances on this topic. The tone is accusatory and defensive, aiming to correct what the author perceives as a misrepresentation of a political figure's stance on abortion.
- The statement does not strive to do no harm, as it uses a derogatory term 'Harridan' to describe Lis Smith, which can be considered harmful and disrespectful. [-2]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not respect the dignity of others, as it engages in name-calling and potentially defamatory language against Lis Smith. [-2]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue, as it resorts to personal attacks rather than addressing the content of the disagreement constructively. [-2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.