Reposted by Dr. Jill Stein🌻
The statement critiques Kamala Harris and Donald Trump for their positions on certain policies, suggesting that Jill Stein is a better alternative for those who support specific progressive policies. It uses a comparative approach to highlight differences in policy stances.
- The statement aims to inform voters about policy differences, which can be seen as striving to do no harm by encouraging informed voting. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in personal attacks but focuses on policy positions, respecting the dignity of the individuals mentioned. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism by comparing policy positions, though it could be seen as somewhat divisive by implying alignment between Harris and Trump without detailed context. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.