Reposted by Dr. Jill Stein🌻
Oliya Scootercaster 🛴
@ScooterCasterNY
·
428d
The statement involves a personal account of participating in a protest that disrupted a political event, which is a form of public discourse as it engages with public issues and civic dialogue. The tone is assertive, indicating involvement in a protest, and the intent is to share personal involvement in a political action.
- The statement does not explicitly promote harm, but the act of disruption could be seen as potentially harmful to the event's proceedings. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech, but it does involve a public protest which can be contentious.Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, as it focuses on disruption rather than dialogue. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue, as it highlights disruption rather than discussion. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses influence to highlight a political stance, but it does so through disruption rather than constructive means. [-1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement exercises free speech but may not use the platform responsibly, as it focuses on disruption. [-1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.