Jill Stien

Rank 37 of 47
|
Score -66

The statement critiques Donald Trump's healthcare plan, specifically questioning the suitability of RFK Jr. for a public health role. It is a critical commentary on a public issue, engaging in the healthcare policy debate.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not use harmful language but is critical of a public figure's policy proposal.
  2. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement aims to promote understanding by providing a professional opinion on RFK Jr.'s qualifications. [+1]
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in constructive criticism of a public policy proposal without resorting to personal attacks. [+1]
  4. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement uses the platform to responsibly critique a public policy issue. [+1]