Reposted by Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez
The statement by @AOC addresses a public issue, specifically the potential overhaul of the CHIPS Act by a Republican majority, and thus constitutes public discourse. The tone is somewhat sarcastic, as it thanks Speaker Johnson for his honesty, implying criticism of the proposed changes.
- The statement does not directly cause harm but uses sarcasm to critique a political stance.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not promote understanding or empathy, as it uses sarcasm rather than constructive dialogue. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in personal attacks but uses sarcasm, which may not foster constructive dialogue. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement upholds free speech and uses the platform to critique a political issue, though the use of sarcasm may not be the most responsible approach. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.