Reposted by Dr. Jill Stein🌻
The statement is critical of Michael Bloomberg and Kamala Harris, using charged language to express disapproval of Bloomberg's endorsement. It references Bloomberg's association with the controversial Stop and Frisk policy and uses a derogatory nickname for Harris, suggesting a negative view of her law enforcement background.
- The statement uses inflammatory language, which could be seen as harmful, reducing its adherence to the principle of doing no harm. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The use of derogatory nicknames and strong accusations may not respect the dignity of the individuals involved. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not engage in constructive dialogue and instead uses personal attacks. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.