Reposted by Dr. Jill Stein🌻
The statement engages in public discourse by addressing political figures and their alleged contradictory stances on a significant public issue, namely the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. It critiques the political strategies of Kamala Harris and Donald Trump, suggesting they are inconsistent in their messaging to different communities. The statement also expresses a personal political choice, indicating support for Jill Stein.
- The statement does not directly harm with words, but it implies deceit by public figures, which could be seen as harmful if unfounded. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying or hate speech, but it does question the integrity of public figures, which is a common aspect of political discourse.Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, as it focuses on criticizing political figures rather than fostering dialogue. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue; it makes a broad accusation without providing evidence or inviting discussion. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement exercises free speech by expressing a political opinion, but it could be more responsible by providing evidence for its claims.Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.