In reply to:
Inversionism
@Inversionism
·
376d
Dr Shawn Baker 🥩
@SBakerMD
·
376d
The statement is part of a conversation criticizing plant-based infant formula, suggesting it is harmful and equating its use to child abuse. The tone is alarmist and accusatory, implying a conspiracy or systemic issue with the use of certain ingredients in baby food.
- The statement uses strong language that could be considered harmful or inflammatory, potentially causing fear or panic. [-2]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- It does not respect the privacy or dignity of those who might choose or need to use plant-based formulas, potentially stigmatizing them. [-2]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement lacks empathy and understanding, focusing on blame rather than constructive dialogue. [-2]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism and instead uses personal attacks and hyperbolic language. [-2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.