Reposted by Bret Baier
The statement appears to engage in public discourse as it discusses polling methodology and potential biases, which are relevant to public debates about election integrity and polling accuracy.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism of a poll without resorting to personal attacks. It acknowledges the work of Selzer while expressing skepticism about the poll's results, which aligns with the principle of engaging in dialogue without ad hominem arguments. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement does not explicitly acknowledge any mistakes, but it does show a willingness to question and analyze the data, which suggests an openness to correction if proven wrong. [+1]Principle 5:I will acknowledge and correct my mistakes.