Reposted by Dr. Jill Stein🌻
The statement highlights voter sentiment in Dearborn, Michigan, particularly within the Arab-American community, regarding international conflicts in Gaza, Lebanon, and Yemen. It suggests that this sentiment could influence political outcomes, specifically against Kamala Harris. The statement is part of public discourse as it addresses political dynamics and voter behavior related to international issues.
- The statement does not appear to cause harm with words or actions, as it reports on voter sentiment without inflammatory language. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects privacy and dignity, focusing on public sentiment rather than personal attacks. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement could promote understanding by highlighting the concerns of a specific community, though it does not explicitly promote empathy or compassion. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments, maintaining a focus on political dynamics. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- By reporting on voter sentiment, the statement uses influence to inform the public about potential political shifts, contributing to civic awareness. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds free speech principles by responsibly reporting on public sentiment and political issues. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.