The statement is emotionally charged and uses strong language to criticize current political choices, suggesting a preference for Jill Stein as an alternative. It implies a moral stance against perceived extreme actions and dissatisfaction with the current political options.
- The statement uses strong, potentially inflammatory language that could be seen as harmful or divisive. [-2]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The language used may not respect the dignity of others, as it implies severe accusations without context. [-2]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding or empathy, as it uses extreme imagery to make a point. [-2]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive dialogue, as it uses emotionally charged language rather than reasoned argument. [-2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.