Reposted by Bret Baier
The statement from the New York Times discusses polling disparities between white Democrats and white Republicans, touching on public issues related to political engagement and polling accuracy. It raises questions about the implications of these disparities, which are relevant to civic dialogue and public discourse.
- The statement does not appear to cause harm with words or actions. It presents data and analysis in a neutral tone.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement could promote understanding by highlighting disparities in polling responses, which may encourage further investigation and discussion. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. It focuses on data and analysis rather than individuals. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement upholds the principles of free speech and uses its platform to inform the public about potential polling issues. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.