The statement involves a political figure, Jill Stein, making a claim about potential actions she would take if elected President, specifically regarding Julian Assange and Edward Snowden. This touches on public issues related to whistleblowing, government transparency, and national security, thus constituting public discourse.
- The statement does not directly cause harm, but the proposal could be controversial given the legal status of Assange and Snowden.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not explicitly promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, but it does suggest a stance on government transparency.Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses influence to propose a controversial policy change, which could be seen as aiming for societal betterment through transparency. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds free speech by proposing a policy change, but the link to 'x.com' lacks context and could undermine the integrity of the message. [-1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.