Jill Stien

Rank 34 of 47
|
Score -46

The statement criticizes the Democratic National Committee (DNC) and Kamala Harris for perceived double standards in rule enforcement, referencing an FCC commissioner's claim about an 'equal time' rule violation. It engages in public discourse by addressing issues of fairness and rule application in political processes.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not directly harm others but implies wrongdoing by the DNC and Kamala Harris, which could be seen as harmful if unfounded. [-1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement does not engage in cyberbullying or hate speech but could be seen as disrespectful by implying lawlessness without evidence. [-1]
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement criticizes the DNC and Kamala Harris but does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments, focusing instead on the issue of rule enforcement. [+1]
  4. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement uses free speech to question political processes, which is a responsible use of the platform, but the integrity of the claim depends on the accuracy of the FCC rule violation. [+1]