Reposted by Dr. Jill Stein🌻
The statement critiques the strategies of major political parties, suggesting they engage in negative tactics to deflect blame for potential electoral losses. It highlights issues of political discourse, misinformation, and scapegoating, which are relevant to public discourse.
- The statement implies harm by accusing parties of using attacks and lies, which could perpetuate divisive rhetoric. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- It accuses parties of engaging in harmful speech, potentially violating privacy and dignity, though it does not directly engage in such speech itself. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding or empathy, as it focuses on negative tactics without offering constructive alternatives. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive dialogue but rather criticizes parties' strategies without fostering discussion. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement attempts to use influence to critique political strategies, but it does so in a way that may not contribute positively to societal discourse. [-1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement exercises free speech but does so in a manner that could be seen as irresponsible by promoting divisive narratives. [-1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.